1 Department of Community Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Puducherry, India

2 Department of Community Medicine, Sri ManakulaVinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India


Introduction: In India, medical undergraduates think that statistics is difficultto understand. Often, it is taught just before final assessment examinationusing didactic lectures, with little use of medical examples and less focus onapplication. Hence, we prepared interactive, participatory sessions for teachingbiostatistics to medical undergraduate.Methods: The sessions were delivered by a facilitator. It had clearly specifiedobjectives, teaching learning strategies. A needs assessment was done byinterviewing the students who had undergone traditional biostatistics teachingmethodology. Specific learning objectives for the sessions were finalizedusing the Delphi technique and review of University syllabus. Two trainedCommunity Medicine faculties designed the lesson plans ‘backwards’ fromdesired outcome to content, teaching/learning strategies, assessment andevaluation process (Outcomes-based lesson planning). Forty, third-semester(Para-clinical phase of the second year) medical undergraduates undertookthese seven teaching sessions. The session followed adult learning principlesand included group discussions, games and reflections. We evaluated theimpact of the sessions using in-depth interviews, retrospective post-then-preself-assessment and a pre-announced written test.Results: With traditional statistics teaching methodology, students perceivedit as a standalone subject and were not interested in statistics. Studentswho underwent the sessions commented that the sessions were enjoyable,interesting, and participatory and more than %90 of them felt they wereengaged throughout the session. They also narrated various instances wherethey could apply the biostatistics learning. In the post-then-pre-assessmentmedian post-session scores for all the objectives were significantly higher(p <0.050).Conclusion: Use of interactive, participatory sessions for teaching biostatisticsto medical undergraduates resulted in a positive reaction and better learning.They also applied these concepts while reading textbooks, listening to lecturesand during clinical postings.Keywords: Biostatistics, Teaching, Medical undergraduates

  1. World Federation for Medical Education. Basic medical
  2. education – WFME global standards for quality
  3. improvement. 2012; Available from: http://www.
  5. standards%20for%20quality%20improvement.pdf.
  6. Medical Council of India. 2015; Available from:
  8. booklet.pdf.
  9. Swift L, Miles S, Price GM, Shepstone L, Leinster SJ. Do
  10. doctors need statistics? Doctors’ use of and attitudes to
  11. probability and statistics. Stat Med. 2009; 28(15):1969-
  12. PubMed PMID: 19452567.
  13. Dongre AR, Deshmukh PR, Garg BS. Formative
  14. exploration of students’ perception about Community
  15. Medicine teaching at Mahatma Gandhi Institute of
  16. Medical Sciences, Sewagram, India. Online Journal of
  17. Health and Allied Sciences. 2008; 7(3):1-5.
  18. Sahai H, Ojeda MM. Problems and challenges
  19. of teaching biostatistics to medical students and
  20. professionals. Medical Teacher. 1999;21(3):286-8.
  21. Indrayan A. Changes needed in style and content of
  22. teaching statistics to medical undergraduates. Int J
  23. Math Educ Sci Technol. 1986;17(1):95-102.
  24. Medical Council of India Minimum standard
  25. requirements for the medical college for 50 admissions
  26. annually 1999; Available from:
  27. helpdesk/how_to_start/STANDARD%20FOR%2050.pdf.
  28. Thangaratinam S, Redman CWE. The Delphi
  29. Technique. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist.
  30. ;7:120-5.
  31. Prideaux D. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine:
  32. Curriculum design. BMJ. 2003 Feb; 1:268-70.
  33. PMCID: PMC1125124.
  34. Kaufman DM. Applying educational theory in practice.
  35. BMJ. 2003; 326:213-6. PubMed PMID: 12543841.
  36. Jaques D. Teaching small groups. BMJ. 2003;
  37. (7387):492-4.
  38. Principles of adult learning. 2012; Available from:
  40. learning.pdf.
  41. Using the retrospective Post-then-Pre design. 2011;
  42. Available from:
  43. resources/pdf/Tipsheet27.pdf.
  44. The Kirkpatrick partners. The Kirkpatrick Philosophy.
  45. [Internet] [cited on 2012 March 29]; Available from:
  47. tabid/66/Default.aspx.
  48. The Kirkpatrick Model of Training Evaluation.
  49. [Internet] [cited on 2012 June 16]; Available fromhttp://
  51. does%20krikpatrick%20reaction%20help%20learnin
  52. g&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CGQQFjAD&url=http
  54. t%2Fjohnson%2F660lectures%2FKirk1.doc&ei=mqv
  55. eT8KnIYrPrQf60MSvDQ&usg=AFQjCNHfuuUmh_
  56. xqEmzRtB33tkUSFWdZhA&cad=rja
  57. Surface and deep learning. 2012 Available from: http://
  59. learning.pdf.
  60. Sandberg JG, Johnson LN, Rohlia M, Miller RB.
  61. Clinician identified barriers to clinical research. Journal
  62. of Marital and Family Therapy. 2002; 28(1):61-7.
  63. PubMed PMID: 11813368.
  64. Freeman JV CS, Staniforth D, Smith KJ.I. Innovations
  65. in curriculum design: A multi-disciplinary approach to
  66. teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students.
  67. BMC Med Educ. 2008 May; 1(8):28. PubMed PMID:
  68. Bland JM. Teaching statistics to medical students using
  69. problem-basedlearning: the Australian experience.
  70. BMC Med Educ. 2004 Dec10;4(1):31. doi:10.1186/1472-
  71. -4-31.
  72. Blejec A. Teaching statistics by using simulations on
  73. the Internet. 2012. Available from http://www.stat.
  75. Stander I. Teaching conceptual vs theoretical statistics
  76. to medical students. 2012. Available from http://www.
  78. Phua K. How to Make the Learning of Statistics
  79. Interesting, Fun and Personally Relevant: Using
  80. Progressive Material as Examples for In-class Analysis
  81. and to Raise Social Awareness. 2012. Available from