Document Type: Commentary

Author

Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Abstract

Introduction: Medical education requires participation of variousstakeholders and this contributes to power dynamics operating atmultiple levels. Personality traits of an individual can affect thesmooth execution of the educational programmes and eventuallythe professionalism of the environment. With the increased focuson leadership traits in medical education and collaboration inhealth care settings, I, through this commentary, would like toexplore the Machiavellian power dynamics involved and how itcan influence the harmony prevailing in an organization.Methods: The author has tried to review the several aspects ofMachiavellianism in health care settings and describe day-to-dayexperiences at four levels; micro (individual), meso (departmental),macro (institutional) and mega (discipline). Introspecting on theunaddressed issues in a different light would help to gain a deeperunderstanding regarding work place ethics and professionalism.Results: The reflection of day-to-day experiences in a differentperspective would provide an insight regarding various issuesto health professionals and help in developing ethical leadershipabilities in them, which eventually promulgates professionalism.Conclusion: To my best knowledge, this is the first commentaryto deal with the implications of Machiavellianism in differentissues related to health care settings. With the increased emphasison the leadership traits related to medical education, analysingorganizational issues in various dimensions is of paramountimportance.Keywords: Leadership, Machiavellianism, Professionalism, Organizational dynamics

Keywords

  1. Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK. Followership theory: a review and research agenda. Leadersh Q 2014; 25 (1):83–104.
  2. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Medical leadership competency framework: Enhancing engagement in medical leadership. 3rd ed. Coventry, UK: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2010.
  3. Heifetz RA. Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
  4. Sosik, JJ, Lee D, Bouquillon E. Context and mentoring: Examining formal and informal relationships in high tech firms and K-12 schools. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2005; 12(2), 94–108.
  5. Dahling JJ, Whitaker BG, Levy PE. The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 2009; 35, 219–257.
  6. Wilson DS, Near D, Miller RR. Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 119, 285-289.
  7. Tijdink JK, Bouter LM, Veldkamp CLS, van de Ven PM, Wicherts JM, Smulders YM. Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehaviour in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(9):e0163251. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163251.
  8. Merrill JM, Camacho Z, Laux LF, Thornby JI, Vallbona C. Machiavellianism in medical students. Am J Med Sci. 1993; 305(5):285-8.
  9. Levy PF. The Nut Island effect. When good teams go wrong. Harvard Bus Rev 2001; 79(3): 51–9, 163.
  10. Sendjaya S, Pekerti A, Härtel C, Hirst G, Butarbutar I. Are Authentic Leaders Always Moral? The Role of Machiavellianism in the Relationship between Authentic Leadership and Morality. J Bus Ethics. 2016; 133 (1): 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2351-0.
  11. Collins SK. Machiavellianism in health care explored: differences in aspiring managers and patient care professionals. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Oct-Dec; 33(4):324-7.
  12. Brown ME, Trevino LK. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 2006; 17(6), 595–616.
  13. Persell CH. Teachers and privatization. In: Levin H, ed. Privatizing Education: Can the Marketplace Deliver Choice, Efficiency, Equity, and Social Cohesion? Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 2001:279–300.
  14. Den Hartog DN, Belschak FD. Work Engagement and Machiavellianism in the Ethical Leadership Process. J Bus Ethics 2012; 107: 35-47.
  15. Sakalaki M, Richardson C, Thepaut Y. Machiavellianism and economic opportunism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2007; 37, 1181–1190.
  16. Weisbord M, Janoff S. Don’t just do something, stand there! Ten principles for leading meetings that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler 2008.
  17. Sparks JR. Machiavellianism and personal success in marketing: The moderating role of latitude for improvisation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1994; 22, 393-400.
  18. Belschak FD, Den Hartog DN, Kalshoven K. Leading Machiavellians: How to Translate Machiavellians’ Selfishness into Pro-Organizational Behaviour. Journal of Management 2013; 41(7), 1934 -56.