Validity & reliability of the Persian version of Grasha-Richmann student learning styles scale
Introduction: The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric
properties of Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Styles Scale.
Method: The participants included 1039 students (421 students in human and 618 students in technical sciences), selected through the stratified sampling method from Tehran University. They answered the Grasha-Riechmann student learning style scale and the data was analyzed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results: The findings acquired from exploratory factor analysis (n=561), using principal components analysis with varimax rotation showed that Grasha- Riechmann Student Learning Styles Scale includes six factors: Avoidant, Collaborative, Participative, Dependent, Competitive, and Independent. The factors acquired from confirmatory factor analysis (n=478), as model fit indices indicated, was confirmed by indices in exploratory factor analysis. The internal consistency of each subscale, ranging from 0.58 to 0.80, was at an acceptable level.
Conclusion: According to the findings, it seems that Participative Styles Scale to be an instrument qualifying validity and reliability for measuring learning interactive styles.
Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Grasha-Richmann scale, Learning styles
Zhang LF, Sternberg RJ. Thinking styles, abilities, and
academic achievement among Hong Kong university
student. Hong Kong educational research association.
Sternberg RJ, Grigorenko E.L. Are cognitive styles still
in style? American psychologist. 1997;52(7):700-12.
Zhang LF. Thinking styles: Their relationships with
modes of thinking and academic performance.
Educational Psychology. 2002; 22:331–48. doi:
Grasha AF, Riechmann S.W. A rational to developing
and assessing the construct validity of a student
learning styles scale instrument. Journal of Psychology.
; 87: 213-23.
Imamipour S, Shams Esfandabad, H. Learning and
cognitive styles. Tehran: Samt; 2011. Persian.
Seyf AA. Modern Educational Psychology. Tehran:
Nashre Doran; 2011. Persian.
Montgomery SM. Student learning styles and their
implications for teaching. University of Michigan Ann
Arbor, MI 1998.
Seidel LE, England EM. Gregorc’s cognitive styles: college
students’ preferences for teaching methods and testing
techniques. Percept Motor Skills. 1999;88(3):859-75.
Entwistle NJ, Ramsden P. Understanding Student
Learning. London: Croom Helm; 2007.
Grasha AF. Teaching with style: A practical guide to
enhancing learning by understanding teaching and
learning style. Pittsburgh: Alliance publishers; 1996.
Ahmadi S, Khezri H. The relationship between math
anxiety and students’ learning styles. New thought in
education of Roudehen Azad University. 2006;1(4).
Arizi HR, Abedi A. Taji M. The relationship between
learning styles profile of guidance school students in
Isfehan and their academic performance in math and
science. Educational Innovations Quarterly. 2010;34.
Elahi T. The relationship between field-Dependent and
field-independent learning styles and achievement in
English: Tarbiat Modarres University; 2002. Persian.
Hoseininasab D, Valinejad Y. Examination of field-
Dependent and field-independent cognitive styles
and self-regulated learning with math performance
of third grade students in guidance school. Journal of
Psychology & education. 2003;3(3/4): 65-78. Persian.
Kadivar P, Homayouni A.R, Abdollahi M.H. The
Relationship between cognitive learning styles and
course choosing among male students in high school
Meyers LS, Gamst G.C, Guarino A.J. Applied
multivariate research. Tehran: Roshd; 2011. Persian.
17. Hooman HA. Structural Equation Modeling by
LISRELL software. Tehran: Samt; 2009. Persian.
Aijaz AG, Rabia T. Assessing learning styles of student
teachers at federal college of education. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 30: 267 – 71. Persian.
Amir R, Jelas Z.M. Teaching and learning styles in
higher education institutions: Do they match. Procedia
Social and Behavioral Sciences.7(C):680–4. Persian.
Baykul Y, Gürsel M, Sulak H, Ertekin E, Yazıcı E,
Dülger O. et al. Validity and reliability study of Grasha-
Riechmann student learning style scale. International
Journal of Human and Social Sciences. 2010;5(3): 177-
Hamidah JS, Sarina M. N, Kamaruzaman J. The Social
interaction learning styles of science and social science
students. Asian Social Science. 2009;5(7):58-64. Persian.
View Counter: Abstract | 3571 | and PDF | 1632 |
- There are currently no refbacks.
P ISSN: 2322-2220 E ISSN:2322-3561
Journal Office Address: Education Development Center, 3th floor, Sina Sadra Halls Complex, Neshat Ave., Shiraz, Iran.
Publisher: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences