Author

Cardiovascular Pharmacology Research Lab, Department of Pharmacology, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medial Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Graduate (PhD) students in medical sciences, who will formfuture faculties and investigators in Iran’s Universities of Medical Sciences, are not trained on scientific writing during their training. The present study describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of Principles of Writing Biomedical Research Paper course.Methods: The course, prepared based on an extensive search of the literature and books on writing biomedical research papers, was offered as an elective course to PhD students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in the second semester of 2011-2012 academic year. The structure and function of various sections of a paper and publication ethics were discussed in lecture and practical sessions over a period of 12 weeks. The course was then evaluated using a self-designed questionnaire.Results: The majority of students gave the highest score (20) to the content and implementation of all sessions of the course. Moreover, most of them believed that the allotted time to the course was not enough, and suggested that it should be increased to 32 hours (equal to two credits). Also, almost all the participants believed that overall the materials lectured were comprehensive, the practical sessions were important in learning the lectured materials, and the course wasuseful in advancing their abilities and skills to write papers.Conclusion: The evaluation of the present course showed that it was able to increase the participants’ knowledge of the structure of scientific papers, and enhanced their abilities and skills to write papers. The evaluation was used as a basis to modify the course.Keywords: Design, Evaluation, Biomedical, Principles of writing

  1. King DA. The scientific impact of nations. Nature. 2004
  2. Jul 15;430(6997):311-6. PubMed PMID: 15254529.
  3. Baldwin C, Chandler GE. Improving faculty publication
  4. output: the role of a writing coach. J Prof Nurs. 2002
  5. Jan-Feb;18(1):8-15. PubMed PMID: 11859488.
  6. Rosenfeldt FL, Dowling JT, Pepe S, Fullerton MJ. How
  7. to write a paper for publication. Heart Lung Circ. 2000
  8. Oct;9(2):82-7. PubMed PMID: 16352000.
  9. Taylor J, Lyon P, Harris J. Writing for publication: a new
  10. skill for nurses? Nurse Educ Pract. 2005 Mar; 5(2):91-6.
  11. PubMed PMID: 19038185.
  12. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski
  13. MF, Tornetta P, 3rd, Cook DJ, et al. Barriers to fulltext
  14. publication following presentation of abstracts at
  15. annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
  16. Jan;85-A(1):158-63. PubMed PMID: 12533587.
  17. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young
  18. G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty
  19. meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA. 1998
  20. Jul 15;280(3):257-9. PubMed PMID: 9676674.
  21. Hicks C. A survey of midwives’ attitudes to, and
  22. involvement in, research: the first stage in identifying
  23. needs for a staff development programme. Midwifery.
  24. Jun;9(2):51-62. PubMed PMID: 8332092.
  25. Marusic A, Marusic M. Teaching students how to read
  26. and write science: a mandatory course on scientific
  27. research and communication in medicine. Acad Med.
  28. Dec;78(12):1235-9. PubMed PMID: 14660423.
  29. Marusic A, Marusic M. What can medical journal
  30. editors do in war? Lancet. 2002 Dec;360 Suppl:s59-60.
  31. PubMed PMID: 12504508.
  32. Keen A. Writing for publication: pressures, barriers
  33. and support strategies. Nurse Educ Today. 2007
  34. Jul;27(5):382-8. PubMed PMID: 16904796.
  35. Sommers PS, Muller JH, Bailiff PJ, Stephens GG.
  36. Writing for publication: a workshop to prepare faculty
  37. as medical writers. Fam Med. 1996 Oct;28(9):650-4.
  38. PubMed PMID: 8909969.
  39. Bydder S, Packer D, Semmens J. The value of a scientific
  40. writing training workshop for radiologists and radiation
  41. oncologists. Australas Radiol. 2006 Feb;50(1):29-32.
  42. PubMed PMID: 16499724.
  43. Hekelman FP, Gilchrist V, Zyzanski SJ, Glover P,
  44. Olness K. An educational intervention to increase faculty publication productivity. Fam Med. 1995
  45. Apr;27(4):255-9. PubMed PMID: 7797004.
  46. Dong Zh GB. Biomedical writing course1998: Available
  47. from: http://www.authoraid.info/resource-library/
  48. china-medical-board-program-resources/cmblessons-
  49. in-scientific-writing/Intro%20Material.pdf.
  50. Dong Zh GB. Biomedical writing course. 1998:
  51. Available from: http://www.authoraid.info/resourcelibrary/
  52. china-medical-board-program-resources/
  53. cmb-lessons-in-scientific-writing/Sci%20Papers-%20
  54. Part%201.pdf.
  55. Dong Zh GB. Biomedical writing course.1998: Available
  56. from: http://www.authoraid.info/resource-library/
  57. china-medical-board-program-resources/cmblessons-
  58. in-scientific-writing/Other%20Writing.pdf.
  59. Cargil M, O’Connor P. Writing Scientific Research
  60. Articles, Strategy and Steps; 2009.
  61. Fraser J. How to publish in biomedicine, 500 tips for
  62. success. Abingdon UK: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2004.
  63. Hall GM. How to write a paper. London: BMJ publishing
  64. groups; 2003.
  65. Hartley J. Academic writing and publishing. London:
  66. Routledge; 2008.
  67. Huth EJ. Writing and publishing in medicine. Baltimore
  68. USA: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
  69. Katz MJ. From research to manuscript, a guide to
  70. scientific writing: Springer Science + Business Media
  71. B.V; 2009.
  72. KÖrner AM. Guide to publishing a scientific paper.
  73. London: Routledge; 2008.
  74. Lang TA. How to write, publish & present in the health
  75. Sciences, a guide for clinicians & laboratory researchers.
  76. Philadelphia, USA: American College of Physicians;
  77. Yang JT. An outline of Scientific writing. Singapore:
  78. World Scientific; 1999.
  79. Zeiger M. Essentials of writing biomedical research
  80. papers.: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
  81. BjörnGustavii. How to write and illustrate a scientific
  82. paper: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2008.
  83. Henninger DE, Nolan MT. A comparative evaluation of
  84. two educational strategies to promote publication by
  85. nurses. J Contin Educ Nurs. 1998 Mar-Apr;29(2):79-84.
  86. PubMed PMID: 9582776.
  87. Lawrence MM, Folcik MA. Writing for publication. J
  88. Nurs Staff Dev. 1996 Nov-Dec;12(6):289-93.
  89. Murray R, Newton M. Facilitating writing for
  90. publication. Physiotherapy 2008; 94(1):29-34. doi:
  91. 1016/j.physio.2007.06.004.
  92. Pololi L, Knight S, Dunn K. Facilitating scholarly
  93. writing in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004
  94. Jan;19(1):64-8. PubMed PMID: 14748862.
  95. Rickard CM, McGrail MR, Jones R, O’Meara P, Robinson
  96. A, Burley M, et al. Supporting academic publication:
  97. evaluation of a writing course combined with writers’
  98. support group. Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jul;29(5):516-
  99. PubMed PMID: 19111370.