Document Type : Review article

Authors

1 Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran

3 Educational Leadership Teaching and Administration, Department College of Education, University of North Texas 1155 Union Circle, Denton, Texas, 76203-5017, USA

4 Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran

10.30476/jamp.2026.108229.2243

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical education is driving a shift from traditional instructional design methods toward personalized and adaptive learning models. Despite numerous promising applications, the available evidence remains limited and fragmented; therefore, a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence is needed to support robust conclusions.
Methods: This study employed the four-phase meta-synthesis framework proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso. A systematic search was conducted across Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis Online, SAGE Journals, and Scopus, covering publications from 2010 to 2025. Studies were screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Coding reliability was assessed through a test–retest procedure, resulting in a reliability coefficient of 0.81.
Results: A total of 273 records were identified, of which 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and obtained CASP scores exceeding the threshold of 30. Content analysis revealed five principal domains: faculty-related applications (21%), student-related applications (28%), applications in the learning process (15%), curriculum development (13%), and assessment mechanisms (23%). Student-related applications constituted the largest proportion, highlighting the pivotal role of learner-centered personalization in AI-driven medical education.
Conclusion: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into individualized educational experiences represents a transformative model for medical education. AI enables adaptive learning pathways, dynamic assessment methods, and data-driven instructional environments, thereby enhancing student engagement, fostering faculty innovation, and promoting equity in learning outcomes. This synthesis proposes an overarching conceptual framework to inform policy, research, and implementation in the context of AI-supported personalized medical education.

Highlights

AVA TAGHAVI MONFARED

AHMAD KEYKHA

 

Keywords

  1. Keykha A, Fazlali B, Behravesh S, Farahmandpour Z. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Meta-Synthesis of Potentials and Pitfalls of ChatGPT. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2025;13(3):155.
  2. Keykha A, Mohammadi H, Darabi F, Hosseini SS. Identifying the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Medical Students. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2025;22(1):e1512.
  3. Keykha A, Imanipour M, Shahrokhi J, Amiri M. The Advantages and Challenges of Electronic Exams: A Qualitative Research based on Shannon Entropy Technique. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2025;13(1):1.
  4. Keykha A. Extraction and classification of smart university components to provide a conceptual framework: A meta-synthesis study. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management. 2022;8(4):75-112.
  5. Keykha A, Hojati M, Taghavi Monfared A, Shahrokhi J. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Unveiling Ethical Challenges Through Meta-Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Research and Health. 2025;15(6):661-82.
  6. Mahdi R, Keykha A, Kaliisa R, Darabi F. Exploring applications of artificial intelligence in enhancing the quality of medical education: a mixed methods research synthesis. Journal of Medical Education Development. 2025;18(4):119-39.
  7. Keykha A, Ahmadi G, Keramatfar A. Navigating the Knowledge Stream: Analyzing ChatGPT's Impact on Education Through Bibliometric. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM). 2025;24(1):1-27.
  8. Mir MM, Mir GM, Raina NT, Mir SM, Mir SM, Miskeen E, et al. Application of artificial intelligence in medical education: current scenario and future perspectives. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2023;11(3):133.
  9. Mansourzadeh A, Rasouli S. The Future of Medical Education: A Review of the Opportunities and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence Integration. Medical Education Bulletin. 2024;5(2):973-82.
  10. Keykha A, Behravesh S, Ghaemi F. ChatGPT and Medical Research: A Meta-Synthesis of Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2024;12(3):135.
  11. Guo E, Ramchandani R, Park YJ, Gupta M. OSCEai: personalized interactive learning for undergraduate medical education. Canadian Medical Education Journal. 2025;16(6):7-14.
  12. Shemshack A, Spector JM. A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments. 2020;7(1):33.
  13. Ramazonovich MO. Personalized learning in pathophysiology: adapting education to student needs. The American Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research. 2025;7(3):32-8.
  14. Major L, Francis GA, Tsapali M. The effectiveness of technology‐supported personalised learning in low‐and middle‐income countries: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;52(5):1935-64.
  15. Ackermans K, Bakker M, van Loon AM, Kral M, Camp G. Young learners’ motivation, self-regulation and performance in personalized learning. Computers & Education. 2025;226:105208.
  16. Rajasekaran SK. Precision Education-The Future of Medical Education. Journal of Medical Education and Practice. 2024;1(1):17-9.
  17. Sandelowski M, Barroso J, Voils CI. Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in nursing & health. 2007;30(1):99-111.
  18. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. USA: Springer Publishing Company; 2006.
  19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
  20. Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, et al. Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;14(1):86–93.
  21. Obeagu EI, Tukur M, Asuma MN. Personalized Learning Plans: Catering to Individual Needs in Sickle Cell Disease Education. Elite Journal of Nursing and Health Science. 2024;2(5):23-9.
  22. Bahmani A, Cha K, Alavi A, Dixit A, Ross A, Park R, et al. Achieving Inclusive Healthcare through Integrating Education and Research with AI and Personalized Curricula. medRxiv. 2024;5(1):4-7.
  23. Tsekhmister Y, Konovalova T, Tsekhmister B. Using behavioral analytics to personalize learning experiences in digital medical education: a case study. Academia. 2023;23(33):83-103.
  24. Ali M, Wahab IB, Huri HZ, Yusoff MS. Personalised learning in higher education for health sciences: a scoping review protocol. Systematic Reviews. 2024;13(1):99.
  25. Raeisi E, Aazami MH, Solati K, Mohamadi O, Ahmady S. A modified student personalized learning approach to prompt academic acquisition in health sciences. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2019;8(1):156.
  26. Rojanasarot S, Milone A, Balestrieri R, Pittenger AL. Personalized learning in an online drugs and US health care system controversies course. American journal of pharmaceutical education. 2018;82(8):6391.
  27. Stambuk‐Castellano M, Carrera A, Tubbs RS, Alario‐Hoyos C, Verdú E, Iwanaga J, et al. Personalized strategies for academic success in learning anatomy: Exploring metacognitive and technological adaptation in medical students. Clinical Anatomy. 2024;37(4):472-83.
  28. Kelly L, Walters L, Rosenthal D. Community-based medical education: is success a result of meaningful personal learning experiences?. Education for health. 2014;27(1):47-50.
  29. Abedi R, Nili Ahmadabadi MR, Taghiyareh F, Aliabadi K, Pourroustaei Ardakani S. The effects of personalized learning on achieving meaningful learning outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. 2021;12(3):177-87.
  30. Sadeqi-Arani Z, Vahidnia R, Nasrabadi EM. Benefits and Application of IoB in Educational Businesses: Smart, Sustainable, and Personalized Learning. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2025;13(1):76.
  31. Rabie RM. The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Education in Medical Curriculum: A Systematic Review of Applications and Challenges. Faculty of Education Journal Alexandria University. 2023;33(4):365-84.
  32. Sunmboye K, Strafford H, Noorestani S, Wilison-Pirie M. Exploring the influence of artificial intelligence integration on personalized learning: a cross-sectional study of undergraduate medical students in the United Kingdom. BMC Medical Education. 2025;25(1):570.
  33. Shen M, Shen Y, Liu F, Jin J. Prompts, privacy, and personalized learning: integrating AI into nursing education—a qualitative study. BMC nursing. 2025;24(1):470.
  34. Hu C, Li F, Wang S, Gao Z, Pan S, Qing M. The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing personalized learning pathways and clinical training in dental education. Cogent Education. 2025;12(1):2490425.
  35. Yovanoff M, Pepley D, Mirkin K, Moore J, Han D, Miller S. Personalized learning in medical education: designing a user interface for a dynamic haptic robotic trainer for central venous catheterization. Inproceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. SAGE Publications. 2017;61(1):615-9.
  36. Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2020;1(1):31-42.
  37. Barisone M, Bagnasco A, Hayter M, Rossi S, Aleo G, Zanini M, et al. Dermatological diseases, sexuality and intimate relationships: A qualitative meta‐synthesis. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2020;29(17-18):3136-53.
  38. Boeije HR, van Wesel F, Alisic E. Making a difference: towards a method for weighing the evidence in a qualitative synthesis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2011;17(4):657-63.
  39. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing. 2008;62(1):107-15
  40. Keykha A, Ezati M, Salehi M. Entrepreneur university model design: Qualitative approach (Case study: University of Tehran). Iranian Journal of Engineering Education. 2019;21(83):51-77.
  41. Keykha A, Ezati M, Khodayari Z. Identification of the barriers and factors affecting the quality of higher education in Allameh Tabataba’i university from the viewpoints of faculty members. Quality in Higher Education. 2022;28(3):326-44.
  42. Keykha A, Towfighi J. Redefining the role of faculty members in higher education policy: a qualitative study using thematic analysis. Iranian Journal of Public Policy. 2021;7(3):55-76.
  43. Keykha A, Ezati M. Identifying factors hindering ecosystem development, entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial university. Innovation Management Journal. 2021;10(2):55-97.
  44. Keykha A. Analysis of causes of unemployment of graduates in higher education. Journal of Teaching in Marine Sciences. 2022;9(1):21-39.
  45. Jafari F, Keykha A, Taheriankalati A, Monfared AT. The role of AI in shaping medical education: insights from an umbrella review of review studies. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2025;13(4):270.
  46. Keykha A, Mohammadi F, Taghavi Monfared A, Taheriankalati A. Unblocking innovation: a meta-synthesis of blockchain applications in medical education, research, and healthcare. Strides in Development of Medical Education. 2025;22(1):1587.
  47. Tetzlaff L, Schmiedek F, Brod G. Developing personalized education: A dynamic framework. Educational Psychology Review. Educational Psychology Review. 2021;33:863-82.
  48. Reber R, Canning EA, Harackiewicz JM. Personalized education to increase interest. Current directions in psychological science. 2018;27(6):449-54.
  49. Tang Y, Liang J, Hare R, Wang FY. A personalized learning system for parallel intelligent education. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. 2020;7(2):352-61.
  50. Wu S, Cao Y, Cui J, Li R, Qian H, Jiang B, et al. A comprehensive exploration of personalized learning in smart education: From student modeling to personalized recommendations. Front Comput Sci. 2026;1:1–61
  51. Naseer F, Khan MN, Tahir M, Addas A, Aejaz SH. Integrating deep learning techniques for personalized learning pathways in higher education. Heliyon. 2024;10(11):e32628.
  52. Vorobyeva KI, Belous S, Savchenko NV, Smirnova LM, Nikitina SA, Zhdanov SP. Personalized Learning through AI: Pedagogical Approaches and Critical Insights. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2025;17(2):ep574.
  53. Ellikkal A, Rajamohan S. AI-enabled personalized learning: empowering management students for improving engagement and academic performance. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management. 2025;22(1):28-44.
  54. Alqahtani T, Badreldin HA, Alrashed M, Alshaya AI, Alghamdi SS, Bin Saleh K, et al. The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in social and administrative pharmacy. 2023;19(8):1236-42.
  55. Son JB, Ružić NK, Philpott A. Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. 2025;5(1):94-112.
  56. Fitria TN. Artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Using AI tools for teaching and learning process. Indonesia: Institut Teknologi Bisnis AAS; 2021. pp. 134-47.
  57. Gerard L, Bradford A, Linn MC. Supporting teachers to customize curriculum for self-directed learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2022;31(5):660-79.
  58. Abbasi BN, Wu Y, Luo Z. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on curriculum development in global higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies. 2025;30(1):547-81.
  59. Tavakoli M, Faraji A, Molavi M, Mol S, Kismihók G. Hybrid human-AI curriculum development for personalised informal learning environments. InLAK22: 12th International learning analytics and knowledge conference; 2022 Mar 21. pp. 563-69.
  60. Hooda M, Rana C, Dahiya O, Rizwan A, Hossain MS. Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022;2022(1):5215722.
  61. Jani KH, Jones KA, Jones GW, Amiel J, Barron B, Elhadad N. Machine learning to extract communication and history-taking skills in OSCE transcripts. Med Educ. 2020;54:1159–70.
  62. Samarakou M, Fylladitakis ED, Karolidis D, Früh WG, Hatziapostolou A, Athinaios SS, et al. Evaluation of an intelligent open learning system for engineering education. Knowl Manag E-Learning Int J. 2016;8:496–513.
  63. Farahmandpour Z, Voelkel R. Teacher Turnover Factors and School-Level Influences: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Education Sciences. 2025;15(2):219.
  64. Farahmandpour Z, Voelkel Jr RH. Unraveling the causes of teacher turnover: A meta-analysis of global literature. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 2025;1:1-7.